The Discipline Committee (DIC) hears and determines allegations of professional misconduct or incompetence against a PEO licence holder (professional engineer “P.Eng.”, temporary licence, provisional licence or a limited licence) or a holder of a Certificate of Authorization.
The DIC’s jurisdiction is triggered upon a decision of the Complaints Committee, Council, or Executive Committee to refer a matter to the DIC for determination. The DIC also hears applications by licence holders who apply for licences or Certificates of Authorization after a prior revocation and suspension. The parties to a discipline proceeding are set out in the Professional Engineers Act.
Pursuant to section 28(3)(b) of the Act, the DIC also fulfills roles similar to what is known as a Fitness to Practise Committee within other self-regulated professions. For further information on reporting such a situation that may involve a licensee, contact PEO’s registrar.
2020 Hearing Schedule
|Name of Parties||Date/Time of Hearing|
|PEO v. Harjinder Singh, P.Eng. and MEM Engineering Inc.||July 9, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.|
Livestream link: https://youtu.be/l7s34yaeSvQ
Note: Due to the pandemic, the PEO offices and hearing rooms are closed to the public and to the parties. The matter has been scheduled by the Chair as a virtual hearing and modalities enabled via Arbitration Place Virtual. The link provided above is a livestream to the hearing and is only publicly viewable during the scheduled time for the hearing.
This schedule of DIC proceedings is provided for public information and is subject to change.
Arbitration Place Virtual (“APV”) has been retained by the tribunal as an all-encompassing service for the facilitation of its virtual hearings proceedings. APV is retained to provide experienced Virtual Case Managers that oversee all technical logistics and technological preparation for the proceeding – both prior to and throughout the matter – so that counsel, the parties, and adjudicators can focus on the substantive issues. APV’s virtual hearing management services include support for document management and display during hearings; facilitation of virtual caucus break-out rooms; coordination with court reporting; hardware upgrades; technical testing and preparatory work. APV is under the direction of the tribunal only.
Stakeholder Comments Requested
As part of its commitment to deliver fair and impartial adjudicative services, the Discipline Committee invites stakeholder comments. If you have suggestions for access improvements, document interactivity, guidelines, forms, or general ease of use of the webpage, please email your comments, in confidence, to: email@example.com.
Discipline Committee Practice Directions
1. Timelines on Release of Discipline Committee Decisions:
At its June 27, 2016 meeting, the Discipline Committee created the following timelines to serve as guidance in order to communicate with stakeholders as to when they can expect to receive a decision on a particular issue in a matter (decisions on the merits of a matter; submissions on sanctions; submissions on publication; or submissions on costs, as the particular matter evolves before the hearing panel.) Going forth, the Discipline Committee is committed to strive for 90 days from release of a merits decision, 60 days for penalty/costs decisions, and 60 days for sanctions and publication decisions after receiving final submissions from the parties. The Discipline Panels will attempt to abide by the timelines, but depending on the complexity of a particular matter, panels may deliver decisions on such issues at its sole discretion.
2. Recorded proceedings and Transcripts:
Motion or hearing proceedings before the Tribunal are recorded by an independent court reporter. If a party wishes a partial or complete transcript, these can be ordered directly from the court reporter in attendance at the proceeding. The name of the attending court reporter is provided to the parties at the beginning of the proceeding. Costs of transcribing the recordings are the party’s responsibility.